Family:
Bibliography
-
Stone, Don, Legend of the Swan Knight. Posting to soc.genealogy.medieval (email list GEN-MEDIEVAL) on 4/10/1996. Subject: BOUILLON. Available at https://groups.google.com/g/soc.genealogy.medieval/c/MwPpFevYrSQ/m/Y5b4KjpOhiMJ. Author address: donstone at CPCN dot COM. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Don Stone SGM 4/10/1996].
-
Schwennicke, Detlev, ed., Europaische Stammtafeln: Stammtafeln zur Geschichte der europaischen Staaten, New Series. III.4 (#601-#820): Das Feudale Frankreich und sein Einfluss auf die Welt des Mittelalters. Marburg: Verlag von J. A. Stargardt, 1989. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: ES III.4 #[0-9]*].
-
Jackman, Donald, Medieval German Counties, available in Nov 2000 at http://sites.netscape.net/erenfried/counts/countyA/county*.htm. county08, county08a, county08b for Verdun, county27 for Louvain. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Jackman GermanCounties].
-
Ravilious, John, Descent from Eustace II of Boulogne to Eleanor de Furnival. Posting to soc.genealogy.medieval (email list GEN-MEDIEVAL) on 6/16/2005. Subject: Eleanor de Furnival, wife of Richard de Brewes. Available at https://groups.google.com/g/soc.genealogy.medieval/c/nqN9a18rNUk/m/uNHIK7MRTB0J. Author address: Therav3 at aol dot com. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: John Ravilious SGM 6/16/2005-163829].
-
Keats-Rohan, K.S.B., Domesday People, A Prosopography of Persons Occurring in English Documents 1066-1166. Vol I: Domesday Book. Bury St Edmunds, Suffolk: Boydell Press, 1999. NYPL ARF 03-4178 vol 1. Corrections in Volume II (Domesday Descendants) pp 4-5. Further corrections at http://users.ox.ac.uk/~prosop/domesday-people-corrigenda.pdf Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Keats-Rohan DP p[0-9]*].
-
van de Pas, Leo, Godfrey de Bouillon. Posting to soc.genealogy.medieval (email list GEN-MEDIEVAL) on 11/15/1998. Subject: Godfrey de Bouillon & Charlemagne. Available at https://groups.google.com/g/soc.genealogy.medieval/c/vslvd75QpmU/m/fjd9a7BFBlgJ. Author address: leovdpas at iinet dot net dot au. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Leo van de Pas SGM 11/15/1998].
-
Moriarty, G Andrews, Plantagenet Ancestry of King Edward III And Queen Philippa. Salt Lake: Mormon Pioneer Genealogical Society, 1985. LDS Film#0441438. NYPL ARF-86-2555. Available at https://familysearch.org/search/film/007905814?cat=66443. Also available at https://familysearch.org/search/catalog/66443. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Moriarty Plantagenet p[0-9]*].
-
Murray, Alan V, The Crusader Kingdom of Jerusalem: A Dynastic History 1099-1125, Oxford: Linacre Unit for Prospographical Research, 2000. vol 4 of Occasional Publications. NYPL ASB 02-6745. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Murray Jerusalem p[0-9]*].
-
Taylor, Nathaniel, Godfrey de Bouillon. Posting to soc.genealogy.medieval (email list GEN-MEDIEVAL) on 11/15/1998. Subject: Godfrey de Bouillon: English family?. Available at https://groups.google.com/g/soc.genealogy.medieval/c/vslvd75QpmU/m/zzkDPBFXxm0J. Author address: ntaylor at fas dot harvard dot edu. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Nat Taylor SGM 11/15/1998-A].
-
Taylor, Nathaniel, Godfrey de Bouillon. Posting to soc.genealogy.medieval (email list GEN-MEDIEVAL) on 11/15/1998. Subject: Godfrey de Bouillon & English family?. Available at https://groups.google.com/g/soc.genealogy.medieval/c/vslvd75QpmU/m/ZNJrM2PZeYsJ. Author address: ntaylor at fas dot harvard dot edu. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Nat Taylor SGM 11/15/1998-B].
-
Richardson, Douglas, Royal Ancestry. Salt Lake City, Utah: Douglas Richardson, 2013. NYPL JFF 16-1184 v1-5 Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Richardson RoyalAnc v1[pc][0-9]*].
-
Tapsell, R. F., Monarchs, Rulers, Dynasties and Kingdoms of the World. New York: Facts on File Publications, 1983. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Tapsell Dynasties p[0-9]*].
-
Wagner, Anthony, Pedigree and Progress, Essays in the Genealogical Interpretation of History, London, Philmore, 1975. Rutgers Alex CS4.W33. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Wagner PedigreeProgress #[0-9]*].
-
Weis, Frederick Lewis, Walter Lee Sheppard, Jr, David Faris, Ancestral Roots of Certain American Colonists who came to America before 1700, 7th Edition, Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co, 1992. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Weis AR7 #[0-9][0-9]*[A-Z]*].
Sources for birth and parent Information
- date:
- at least 15 or 16 in 1076 [Ref: Murray Jerusalem p156]
- earlier than 1061 [Ref: Weis AR7 #158A]
- second son [Ref: Keats-Rohan DP p196, Murray Jerusalem p158],
- place:
- [Ref: Weis AR7 #158A],
- parents:
- [Ref: John Ravilious SGM 6/16/2005-163829, Keats-Rohan DP p196,
Keats-Rohan DP p277, Moriarty Plantagenet p165, Murray Jerusalem p158,
Richardson RoyalAnc v1p465, Wagner PedigreeProgress #1, Weis AR7 #158A],
- grandfather:
- Eustace I Count of Boulogne [Ref: Jackman GermanCounties],
- maternal-grandfather:
- Godfrey IV Duke of Lorraine [Ref: Tapsell Dynasties
p198]
Sources for death Information
- date:
- [Ref: Weis AR7 #158A]
- (18.VII 1100) [Ref: ES III.4 #621]
- 1100 [Ref: John Ravilious SGM 6/16/2005-163829, Murray Jerusalem p158,
Wagner PedigreeProgress #1]
- 1101 [Ref: Tapsell Dynasties p198],
- place:
- [Ref: Weis AR7 #158A]
- Palastina [Ref: ES III.4 #621]
Research Notes:
Duke of Lower Lorraine [Ref: Keats-Rohan DP p196, Richardson RoyalAnc v1p465,
Weis AR7 #158A]
Hz v Niederlothringen [Ref: ES III.4 #621]
Count of Boulogne [Ref: Weis AR7 #158A]
Ruler of Jerusalem [Ref: Wagner PedigreeProgress #1]
Wagner considers Godfrey, father of William "prob illeg", and not
identical with the Advocate of the Holy Sepulcher [Ref: Weis AR7 #158A]
1076: allowed to take up his Lotharingina inheritance [Ref: Murray Jerusalem
p156]
1088: Duke of Lower Lorraine, as Godfrey VI [Ref: Tapsell Dynasties p198]
leader of the First Crusade, elected King of Jerusalem, but took the
title Advocate of the Holy Sepulcher; succeeded by next younger brother
Baldwin, Count of Edessa [Ref: Weis AR7 #158A]
Advocate of the Holy Seculcher [Ref: Richardson RoyalAnc v1p465]
1099: King of Jerusalem [Ref: Tapsell Dynasties p198]
In "The Swan Badge and the Swan Knight" by the late Sir Anthony R. Wagner in
Archaeologia, vol. 97, 1959, pp. 127-138, supplemented by many illustrations
and a chart. (An abbreviated version of this discussion later appeared in his
Pedigree and Progress.) Wagner tells us that Godfrey of Bouillon became
identified fairly soon after his death with the legend of the swan knight in
stories propagated by various courtly poets and chroniclers; Godfrey's mother
was said to be a daughter of the swan knight in many of these accounts. Then,
beginning some 200 years after Godfrey's death many different descendants of
this family began using swans in their heraldry, among them the Bohun earls of
Hereford and Essex, for example. [Ref: Don Stone SGM 4/10/1996]
Note: Although the Lotharingian name, Godofred, borne by the famous leader of
the First Crusade, has been transcribed into English as 'Godfrey', this is
etymologically incorrect. The name is, instead, the equivalent of the name
which normally appears in cintemporary French or Anglo-Norman documents in
such forms as "Goisfrid' and "Gauzfrid', the prototypes of modern "Geoffrey'.
...J. Horace Round (1895, p.256[no citation given]), citing Domesday
references to property held by Goisfrid, son of Count Eustace in right of his
wife, daughter of Geoffrey de Mandeville, says that 'Dr. Liebermann asks
whether Geoffrey's daughter was not thus 'the first wife, else unknown, of the
future King of jerusalem'.' The reference is presumably to the linguistically
sophisticated Anglo-Saxonist, Felix Liebermann, who would have made the
equation. However, in an article published a year later, on Faramus, grandson
of "Goisfrid', Round makes no mention of this identification. He had come to
recognize that "Goisfrid' was the equivalent of later Geoffrey and had been
informed by his friend, M.V.J. Vaillant, of Boulogne 'that the sons of Eustace
are known and that Geoffrey is not among them'. What M. Vaillant should have
written was that there was no Godfrey among them. However, Round accepted the
testimony of his linguistically naive friend against that of Liebermann and
therefore invented a non-existent bastard son, Geoffrey, of Eustace of
Boulogne. The truth was later recognized by Joseph Armitage Robinson in his
study of the Crispins, and by H.W.C. Davis (1913) who drew attention to the
fact that ''Godfrey' of Jerusalem married Beatrice, daughter of Geoffrey de
mandeville and aunt of the first Earl of Essex.
While the holdings of Geoffrey de mandeville were not nearly as great as
those of Eustace of Boulogne, he was a very substantial landholder in 11
counties and his daughter a suitable match "Godfrey' who had already inherited
a great deal from his maternal uncle. That De Mandeville would have alienated
property in order to give his daughter in marriage to a bastard son of Count
Eustace, lacking any substantial prospects, is highly unlikely.
More recently, Johnson and Cronne, good historians but poor linguists, have
used Round's article to 'correct' Davis. The true identity of Geoffrey/Godfrey
was recognized again by Miss Catherine Morton, who has been in touch with DHK
[David H. Kelley] and with Sir Anthony Wagner on this matter. Wagner(1975, p.
253, with an unfortunate misprint) mentions the 'confusion' between
'Godfrey'and 'Geoffrey'. It was there assumed that the confusi9on was ancient
and that Eustace's son Godofred, was genuinely a Godfrey. It should be
emphasized that actually the confusion is entirely modern due to the use of
'Godfrey' to transcribe a name which is etymologically 'Geoffrey' (the Germans
use 'Gottfried' both for the leader of the first crusade and for Geoffrey
Plantagenet, Count of Anjou--onew may regard this either as desirable
consisttency or double error).
Wagner cites the views of Stephen Runciman, a historian of the crusades,
pointing out that crusader sources make no suggestion of a wife for "Godfrey'
and emphasizing his chastity. However, a wife and child left in England would
not necessarily have been known to such sources, nor was there anything
notable in a Crusader leaving s wife behind, though certainly noteworthy if he
brought a wife with him. Runciman's further suggestion that 'Godfrey' might
have made some sort og 'morganatic alliance must be rejected. The concept is
completely foreign to the period, save, perhaps, among the Welsh and would, in
any case, hardly apply to a marriage of 'Godfrey/Geoffrey' with Beatrice de
Mandeville, of a family whose status was fully comparable to his own. It is
extremely unlikely that 'maritagium', the term used for Goisfrid's marriage,
would be applied to a union which was in any way irregular. Runciman is
looking back from the days of 'Godfrey's' greatness, rather than realistically
appraising the situation at the time of his marriage. [David Humiston Kelley
was the author of this line.] [Ref: Weis AR7 #158A]
What happened to the 'inheritance' of Godfrey of Bouillon? Anthony Bridge, in
his book "The Crusades" published in 1980, a long time after the other
mentioned sources, on page 116 he records what happened:.....a group of
Godfrey's own Lorrainers, who hated the papal legate, took control of the
city, and sent a messenger to Baldwin of Edessa, Godfrey's brother, inviting
him to come at once and TAKE OVER HIS RIGHTFUL INHERITANCE AS NEXT OF KIN. The
brother was next of kin, because Godfrey did not have children. If Godfrey de
Bouillon, Duke of Lower-Lorraine, had had a legitimate son, surely he would
have been either King of Jerusalem or Duke of Lower-Lorraine, and not the
holder of a small property in England. How can Dr. Liebermann speculate
whether Beatrix de Mandeville is "the first wife, else unknown of the future
King of Jerusalem" when there was no second wife---nor was Godfrey/Gottfried
King of Jerusalem. [Ref: Leo van de Pas SGM 11/15/1998]
If that is exactly what the message said, and not a historian's assumption (or
the testimony of a non-contemporary like William of Tyre) based on the
assumption that that's the argument that would have been used, than it's
significant, otherwise not so. The issue of succession to the lordship of
Jerusalem, as with other crusader property overseas, may have been settled
without dealing with the niceties of kin--even close kin--left behind in
Western Europe. Runciman 1:315-26 tells of the frantic scramble for control of
the lordship after Godfrey's death. Godfrey had actually willed Jerusalem to
the patriarch, but the Lorraine party, whose interest were opposed to the
Norman and Italian faction (which would assume leadership through the
patriarch) sent the bishop of Ramleh and others to fetch Baldwin "for they
would only obey one of his [i.e. Godfrey's] kin" (315). So in Runciman's
language, this point is slightly different. [Ref: Nat Taylor SGM 11/15/1998-B]
A "Goisfrid", son of Count Eustace [of Boulogne] is mentioned in Domesday Book
as an English landholder, married to Beatrice de Mandeville (aunt of the first
earl of Essex). Round (whom Schwennicke cites) and later Sir Anthony R. Wagner
(in _Pedigree and Progress_, pp. 159 & 253) were convinced that this man was a
separate person from the Crusader Godfrey (and was thus necessarily
illegitimate, because Count Eustace's [legitimate] sons were known and did not
include a "Goisfrid/Geoffrey").
However, The brief by David H. Kelley inserted in Weiss' _Ancestral Roots_,
7th ed., presents compelling arguments to show that the two men may have been
the same. He points out that Goisfrid was onomastically equivalent to Godfrey
(something Round ignored as the modern derivations, Geoffrey and Godfrey, are
distinct but not their medieval equivalents), and that there is no evidence
that the known data on the English landholder with a wife and heir in England
and the leader of the first crusade cannot apply to one and the same person.
This identity has indeed been on the table, as a query, since Round's day:
Kelley mentions the work of Felix Liebermann, Joseph Armitage Robinson, and H.
W. C. Davis as "pro".
One significant counterargument, raised by Wagner, is that none of the
sources for the First Crusade ever allude to a marriage for Godfrey: rather
they tout his chastity. This is less compelling when it is understood that
contemporary writings of the first crusade don't talk much about the
crusaders' home lives, and many of them left families behind. Thereafter much
of the surviving historiography of the Crusades (from the twelfth century
onward) is tainted with the themes of moral fitness for possession of the Holy
Land. Godfrey succeeded in an enterprise which others, later, could not
sustain: therefore in retrospect his virtue must have been beyond theirs.
Think of Tasso's oberblown moral epic _Gierusalemme liberata_.
While this is not a proven descent (as Mr. Mann's database dump suggests),
nor is it a fruitless and closed case as Mr. van de Pas thought. It is an
intriguing hypothesis which deserves more complete scrutiny, and in a
different forum, than it has yet had. Kelley, at least, suggests that
determined digging may turn up more English records which will help tip the
scales one way or the other. [Ref: Nat Taylor SGM 11/15/1998-A]
Pedigree of Godfrey Of Bouillon Count Of Boulogne, Leader Of First Crus
/-----
Odoacre Count Of Harlebec
/-----
Baldwin I Bras De Fer Count Of Flanders
/-----
Baldwin II The Bald Count Of Flanders
| | /-----
Charles II The Bald King Of Franks, Emperor
| \-----
Judith
| \-----
Ermentrude Of Orleans
/-----
Adelulf Count Of Boulogne
| | /-----
Ethelwolf King Of England
| | /-----
Alfred The Great King Of England
| | | \-----
Osburh
| \-----
Alfthryth Of England
| | /-----
Aethelred Earl Of Mercia
| \-----
Ealhswith
| \-----
Eadburgh Of Mercia
/-----
Arnulf Count Of Boulogne
/-----
Baldwin Count Of Boulogne
/-----
Eustace I Count Of Boulogne
| | /-----
Gerulf Count Of Holland
| | /-----
Thierri I Count Of West Friesland
| | /-----
Thierri II Count Of West Friesland
| | | | /-----
Wichmann I Count Of Hainault
| | | | /-----
Meginhard Count Of Hainault
| | | | | \-----
Evesa
| | | \-----
Geva
| | /-----
Arnulf Count Of Holland And Ghent
| | | | /-----
Baldwin I Bras De Fer Count Of Flanders
| | | | /-----
Baldwin II The Bald Count Of Flanders
| | | | | \-----
Judith
| | | | /-----
Arnold I The Old Count Of Flanders
| | | | | | /-----
Alfred The Great King Of England
| | | | | \-----
Alfthryth Of England
| | | | | \-----
Ealhswith
| | | \-----
Hildegarde Of Flanders
| | | | /-----
Herbert I Count Of Vermandois
| | | | /-----
Herbert II Count Of Vermandois
| | | | | \-----
Beatrice Of Morvois
| | | \-----
Alix De Vermandois
| | | | /-----
Robert I King Of France
| | | \-----
Hildebrante/Liegarde/Adela
| | | \-----
Aelis
| \-----
Adela Of Holland
| | /-----
(Unk)
| | /-----
Wigeric Count in Bidgau
| | /-----
Siegfried Count Of Luxemburg
| | | \-----
Cunegunde
| | | | /-----
Louis II The Stammerer King Of France
| | | \-----
Ermentrude Of France
| | | \-----
Adelaide
| \-----
Luitgard Of Luxembourg
| | /-----
Eberhard III Count In Nordgau
| | /-----
Hugh I Count In Abracian Nordgau
| | /-----
Ebergard Count In The Nordgau, Count Of Alsace
| | | \-----
Hildegarde
| \-----
Hedwig Of Nordgau
| \-----
Bertha
/-----
Eustace II Count Of Boulogne
| | /-----
Giselbert, Count In The Massgau
| | /-----
Giselbert Count Of Darnau
| | | \-----
(Unk) Of Hesbaye
| | /-----
Regnier I Count Of Hainaut
| | | | /-----
Lothair I King Of Italy, Emperor Of The West
| | | \-----
Ermengarde Of Lorraine
| | | \-----
Ermengarde Of Tours
| | /-----
Regnier II Count Of Hainaut
| | | | /-----
Louis I The Fair Emperor Of The West
| | | | /-----
Charles II The Bald King Of Franks, Emperor
| | | | | \-----
Judith Of Bavaria
| | | \-----
Hersent Of France
| | | | /-----
Eudes Count Of Orleans
| | | \-----
Ermentrude Of Orleans
| | | \-----
Engeltrude
| | /-----
Regnier III Count Of Hainaut
| | | | /-----
Richard Count Of Amiens
| | | | /-----
Budwine Count Of Metz
| | | | /-----
Richard The Justiciar Duke Of Bourgogne
| | | | | | /-----
Boso III The Old Count Of Arles And Tuscany
| | | | | \-----
Richilda
| | | \-----
Adelaide Of Burgundy
| | | | /-----
Conrad I Of Burgandy, Count Of Auxerra
| | | | /-----
Conrad II Duke Of Transjurand Burgandy
| | | | | \-----
Aelis Of Tours And Alsace
| | | \-----
Adelaide Of Burgundy
| | | \-----
Walrada
| | /-----
Lambert I The Bearded Count Of Louvain
| | | | /-----
Walbert Count In The Therwitugas
| | | | /-----
(Unk)
| | | | | \-----
Altberg
| | | | /-----
Dietrich Count in Westfalen
| | | | | | /-----
Eckbert The Loyal Count In Dreini And Ittergaus
| | | | | \-----
Matilda
| | | | | \-----
Ida
| | | | /-----
Lambert Count Of Louvain
| | | | | \-----
Ragenhilda
| | | \-----
Adele Of Louvain
| | | | /-----
Richfrid Count Of Betuew And Hersinde
| | | \-----
(Unk Dau) Of Betuwe
| \-----
Maud Of Louvain
| | /-----
Charles II The Bald King Of Franks, Emperor
| | /-----
Louis II The Stammerer King Of France
| | | \-----
Ermentrude Of Orleans
| | /-----
Charles III The Simple King Of Franks
| | | | /-----
Adalhard Count Of Paris
| | | \-----
Adelaide
| | /-----
Louis IV D'OUTRE-MER, King Of Franks
| | | | /-----
Alfred The Great King Of England
| | | | /-----
Edward The Elder King Of England
| | | | | \-----
Ealhswith
| | | \-----
Edgiva
| | | | /-----
Aethelhelm Ealdorman Of Wiltshire
| | | \-----
Alfflaed
| | | \-----
Aethelgyth
| | /-----
Charles Duke Of Lower Lorraine
| | | | /-----
Ludolph Duke Of Saxony
| | | | /-----
Otto The Illustrious Duke Of Saxony
| | | | | \-----
Oda
| | | | /-----
Henry I The Fowler King Of The Saxons
| | | | | | /-----
Heinrich Of Thuringia, King Of Austriasia
| | | | | \-----
Hedwige/Hadui/Haduich
| | | | | \-----
Ingeltrud Of Friuli
| | | \-----
Gerberga Of Saxony
| | | | /-----
(Unk)
| | | | /-----
Dietrich Count in Westfalen
| | | | | \-----
Matilda
| | | \-----
Mechtilde Of Westfalen
| | | \-----
Ragenhilda
| \-----
Gerberga Of Lorraine
| \-----
Adelheid Of Ardennes
Godfrey Of Bouillon Count Of Boulogne, Leader Of First Crus
| /-----
(Unk)
| /-----
Wigeric Count in Bidgau
| /-----
Gonzelon Count In Bidgau
| | \-----
Cunegunde
| | | /-----
Louis II The Stammerer King Of France
| | \-----
Ermentrude Of France
| | \-----
Adelaide
| /-----
Godfrey Count Of Verdun
| | | /-----
(Unk)
| | | /-----
Gerhard Count In Metzgau
| | \-----
Oda Of Metz
| | | /-----
Ludolph Duke Of Saxony
| | | /-----
Otto The Illustrious Duke Of Saxony
| | | | \-----
Oda
| | \-----
Udo Of Saxony
| | | /-----
Heinrich Of Thuringia, King Of Austriasia
| | \-----
Hedwige/Hadui/Haduich
| | \-----
Ingeltrud Of Friuli
| /-----
Gothelo I Duke Of Upper And Lower Lorraine
| | | /-----
Billung Count In Saxony
| | | /-----
Hermann Billung Duke Of Saxony
| | | | \-----
Fraderuna
| | \-----
Matilda Of Saxony
| | \-----
Hildegarde Of Westerbourg
| /-----
Godfrey IV The Bearded Duke Of Lower Lorraine
| | | /-----
Eudes Count In Lahngau
| | | /-----
Gebhard Duke Of Lorraine
| | | | \-----
Judith
| | | /-----
Udo Count In The Wetterau
| | | | \-----
Ita
| | | /-----
Conrad I Duke Of Swabia
| | | | | /-----
Pepin Count Of Senlis, Peronne, & St. Quentin
| | | | | /-----
Herbert I Count Of Vermandois
| | | | | | \-----
(Unk Dau) Of Vermandois
| | | | \-----
Cunegundis Of Vermandois
| | | | | /-----
Guerra I Count Of Morvois
| | | | \-----
Beatrice Of Morvois
| | | | \-----
Eve Of Roussillon
| | | /-----
Conrad III Of Swabia, Count Of Ortenau
| | | | | /-----
Adalbert Count Of Marchtal
| | | | \-----
Judith Of Marchtal
| | | | | /-----
Ulrich IV Count Of Argengau
| | | | | /-----
Ulrich V Count Of Argengau
| | | | | | \-----
Perehheide
| | | | \-----
(Unk Dau)
| | | | | /-----
(Unk)
| | | | \-----
Wendelgarde
| | \-----
Ita
| | | /-----
Wigeric Count in Bidgau
| | | /-----
Gonzelon Count In Bidgau
| | | | \-----
Cunegunde
| | | /-----
Godfrey Count Of Verdun
| | | | | /-----
Gerhard Count In Metzgau
| | | | \-----
Oda Of Metz
| | | | \-----
Udo Of Saxony
| | | /-----
Frederick Count Of Verdon
| | | | | /-----
Billung Count In Saxony
| | | | | /-----
Hermann Billung Duke Of Saxony
| | | | | | \-----
Fraderuna
| | | | \-----
Matilda Of Saxony
| | | | \-----
Hildegarde Of Westerbourg
| | \-----
Beatrix
\-----
Ida Of Lorraine
\-----
Doda/Ida
Descendants of Godfrey Of Bouillon Count Of Boulogne, Leader Of First Crus