Family:
Marriage:
Children:
- Skule
- Ketel
Marriage:
Children:
- Adelheid Of Bavaria
- Kunizza Death: 6 Mar 1120
- Welf V Duke Of Bavaria Birth: Abt 1073
Death: 24 Sep 1120 in Kaufering
- Henry IX The Black Duke Of Bavaria Birth: 1074
Death: 13 Dec 1126 in Ravensburg
Bibliography
-
Brandenburg, Erich, Die Nachkommen Karls des Grossen, Faksimile-Nachdruck von 1935 (Facsimile reproduction of 1935), mit Korrekturen und Erganzungen versehen von (with corrections and additions provided by) Manfred Dreiss und Lupold v. Lehsten. Neustadt an der Aisch:Verlag Degener, 1995. NYPL ATH (Charlemagne) 96-4768. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Brandenburg 1995 p[0-9]*].
-
Cokayne, George Edward, Complete Peerage of England, Scotland, Ireland, Great Britain, and the United Kingdom, extant, extinct, or dormant, vol 09, Moels-Nugent. London: St Catherine Press, 1936. Reprinted (4 per page) Gloucester: A Sutton, 1982. Available at https://familysearch.org/search/catalog/271412 Information from this source tagged as [Ref: CP IX [Ap][p0-9].*].
-
Schwennicke, Detlev, ed., Europaische Stammtafeln: Stammtafeln zur Geschichte der europaischen Staaten, New Series. I: Die Stammesherzoge, Die Weltlichenkurforsten, Die Kaiserlichen, Koniglichen und Grossherzoglichen Familien. Marburg: Verlag von J. A. Stargardt, 1980. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: ES I #[0-9]*].
-
Schwennicke, Detlev, ed., Europaische Stammtafeln: Stammtafeln zur Geschichte der europaischen Staaten, New Series. I.1: Die frankischen Konige und die Konige und Kaiser, Stammesherzoge, Kurfursten, Markgrafen und Herzoge des Heiligen Romischen Reiches Deutscher Nation. Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 1998. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: ES I.1 #[0-9]*].
-
Schwennicke, Detlev, ed., Europaische Stammtafeln: Stammtafeln zur Geschichte der europaischen Staaten, New Series. II: Die Ausserdeutschen Staaten Die Regierenden Hauser der Ubrigen Staaten Europas. Marburg: Verlag von J. A. Stargardt, 1984. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: ES II #[0-9]*].
-
The Henry Project: The Ancestors of King Henry II of England, An eperiment in a cooperative online database for scholarly medieval genealogy. Contributors and Editors: Stewart Baldwin, Todd Farmerie, Peter Stewart. Available at https://fasg.org/projects/henryproject/ Information from this source tagged as [Ref: HenryII .*].
-
Moriarty, G Andrews, Plantagenet Ancestry of King Edward III And Queen Philippa. Salt Lake: Mormon Pioneer Genealogical Society, 1985. LDS Film#0441438. NYPL ARF-86-2555. Available at https://familysearch.org/search/film/007905814?cat=66443. Also available at https://familysearch.org/search/catalog/66443. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Moriarty Plantagenet p[0-9]*].
-
Paget, Gerald, The Lineage and Ancestry of H.R.H. Prince Charles, Prince of Wales. London: Charles Skilton Ltd, 1977. Nypl ARF+ 78-835. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Paget HRHCharles p[0-9]*].
-
Redlich, Marcellus Donald R Von, Pedigrees of Some of the Emperor Charlemagne's Descendants. Order of the Crown of Charlemagne, 1941. M-LH 929.7 PED v1. Available at https://familysearch.org/search/catalog/213795. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Redlich CharlemagneDesc p[0-9()]*].
-
Richardson, Douglas, Royal Ancestry. Salt Lake City, Utah: Douglas Richardson, 2013. NYPL JFF 16-1184 v1-5 Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Richardson RoyalAnc v5p[0-9]*].
-
Baldwin, Stewart, Parents of Judith wife of Tostig. Posting to soc.genealogy.medieval (email list GEN-MEDIEVAL) on 5/17/2000. Subject: Judith married to Tostig of Northumberland. Available at https://groups.google.com/g/soc.genealogy.medieval/c/6aUSd573ffw/m/F0ZCcJuQAGAJ. Author address: sbaldw at mindspring dot com. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Stewart Baldwin SGM 5/17/2000].
-
Baldwin, Stewart, Judith of Flanders (NOT Normandy). Posting to soc.genealogy.medieval (email list GEN-MEDIEVAL) on 8/12/2002. Subject: Judith of Flanders (NOT Normandy). Available at https://groups.google.com/g/soc.genealogy.medieval/c/xZwXhtg8I58/m/Y4BZRxN8uXIJ. Author address: sbaldw at mindspring dot com. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Stewart Baldwin SGM 8/12/2002-000336].
-
Watney, Vernon James, The Wallop Family and their Ancestry, Oxford:John Johnson, 1928. LDS Film#1696491 items 6-9. NYPL ARZ+ (Wallop) (Watney, V. J. Wallop family). Available at https://familysearch.org/search/catalog/213421. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Watney WALLOP #[0-9]*].
-
Weir, Alison, Britain's Royal Families, The Complete Genealogy, London: Bodley Head, 1989. Nypl ARF 89-26908 Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Weir RoyalFam p[0-9]*].
-
Weis, Frederick Lewis, Walter Lee Sheppard, Jr, David Faris, Ancestral Roots of Certain American Colonists who came to America before 1700, 7th Edition, Baltimore: Genealogical Publishing Co, 1992. Information from this source tagged as [Ref: Weis AR7 #[0-9][0-9]*[A-Z]*].
Sources for birth and parent Information
- date:
- (1033) [Ref: ES I #58]
- 1030x1036 [Ref: HenryII judit000 10/11/2002]
- abt 1033 [Ref: Brandenburg 1995 p9, Moriarty Plantagenet p167],
- parents:
- [Ref: Brandenburg 1995 p9, HenryII baldw004 6/2/2008, Stewart Baldwin
SGM 8/12/2002-000336, Weis AR7 #166]
- Baldwin Count of Flanders & dau Richard II [Ref: HenryII judit000
10/11/2002, Richardson RoyalAnc v5p486]
- Baldwin IV & (N v Normandie T v Richard II) [Ref: ES I.1 #18 (before
corr in I.2)],
- father:
- [Ref: CP IX p703, ES I #58, ES II #79, Moriarty Plantagenet p167,
Paget HRHCharles p222, Redlich CharlemagneDesc p271, Watney WALLOP #408,
Watney WALLOP #65],
- name:
- also called Fausta [Ref: CP IX p703]
Sources with Inaccurate birth and parent Information
- date:
- posthumous 1028 [Ref: ES I.1 #18 (with corr in I.2), ES II #79],
- father:
- Richard III Hz v Normandie (#10882) [Ref: ES I.1 #18 (with corr in
I.2)],
- mother:
- Adelaide of France (#10959) [Ref: ES II #79]
- Ogive of Luxemburg (#10961) [Ref: Redlich CharlemagneDesc p271]
- Otgiva of Luxembourg (#10961) [Ref: Watney WALLOP #408]
Sources for death Information
- date:
- [Ref: Brandenburg 1995 p9, ES I #58, ES I.1 #18 (with corr in I.2), ES
II #79, HenryII baldw004 6/2/2008, HenryII judit000 10/11/2002, Moriarty
Plantagenet p167, Paget HRHCharles p222]
- 4 Mar 1094 [Ref: Redlich CharlemagneDesc p271, Weis AR7 #166]
Sources for burial Information
- place:
- [Ref: ES I #58, Moriarty Plantagenet p167]
Sources with Information about marriage to Tostig Earl Of Northumbria
- date:
- [Ref: Weir RoyalFam p35]
- 1051 (or perhaps a bit earlier) [Ref: HenryII judit000 10/11/2002]
- first marriage of Judith [Ref: Brandenburg 1995 p9, ES I #58, ES I.1 #18
(before corr in I.2), HenryII baldw004 6/2/2008, Paget HRHCharles p222, Weis
AR7 #166]
- um 1045/47 [Ref: ES II #79],
- names:
- [Ref: CP IX p703, Richardson RoyalAnc v5p496],
- child:
- [Ref: Weir RoyalFam p35]
Sources with Information about marriage to Welf IV Duke Of Bavaria
- date:
- [Ref: ES I.1 #18 (with corr in I.2), ES II #79]
- 1071 [Ref: ES I #58, Paget HRHCharles p222, Weis AR7 #166]
- abt 1071 [Ref: Brandenburg 1995 p9, Moriarty Plantagenet p167, Redlich
CharlemagneDesc p271]
- second marriage of Judith [Ref: HenryII baldw004 6/2/2008, HenryII
judit000 10/11/2002],
- names:
- [Ref: Richardson RoyalAnc v5p496, Watney WALLOP #408],
- child:
- [Ref: Brandenburg 1995 p9, ES I #58, ES I.1 #18, Moriarty Plantagenet
p167, Paget HRHCharles p222, Paget HRHCharles p223, Redlich CharlemagneDesc
p271, Watney WALLOP #65, Weis AR7 #166]
Sources with Inaccurate marriage information
- child:
- Ita of Cham (#14323), wife of Leopold II Margrave of Austria [Ref:
Watney WALLOP #35, Watney WALLOP #65]
Research Notes:
This {her parentage} is discussed in Freeman's History of the Norman Conquest
of England, vol. 3, pp. 663-5, where he concludes that Judith was the daughter
of Baldwin IV by a daughter of Richard II of Normandy. The principle primary
sources cited (among other, later ones) are the nearly contemporary Vita
Edwardi (a life of Edward the Confessor), which states that she was a sister
of Baldwin V of Flanders and a "niece" ("... neptem ...") of Edward (the word
"niece" being explained away as "daughter of a fist cousin", Edward's mother
being Emma of Normandy); Florence of Worcester, who under the year 1051 calls
her a daughter of Baldwin, count of Flanders; Orderic Vitalis, who twice
refers to her as a sister of Matilda of Flanders and daughter of Baldwin V
(not IV, but he is otherwise confused on his genealogy here), followed in this
by some later writers; and the "Saxon annalist", who calls Judith an aunt of
count Robert of Flanders (son of Baldwin V) and a relative of king Ethmund
(presumably meaning Edward the Confessor), but this annalist errs in making
Judith the wife of Harold rather than Tostig. [Ref: Stewart Baldwin SGM
5/17/2000]
One of the problems in analyzing the evidence for the parentage of Judith
(successively wife of Tostig of Northumbria and Welf of Bavaria, and ancestor
of many important figures of European history through her second marriage) is
that we did not know the underlying reasons for the one theory that she was a
daughter of Richard III of Normandy. Following the trail of bibliographic
citations had led us back to the following two articles by Hansmartin
Decker-Hauff: Zur alteren Geschichte der Welfen, in Weingarten, Festschrift
zur 900-Jahr-Feier des Klosters (1956), 31-48.
Judith von der Normandie, in Schwabische Lebensbilder 6 (1957), 16-27.
Courtesy of James Hansen, FASG, I now have copies of both of these articles
by Decker-Hauff, and, as one might guess from the subject line of this
posting, I did not find the arguments convincing. Of these two articles, the
second is simply a biography of Judith, with her parentage presented as proven
from the previous article, and no new evidence. Thus, the first of these
articles is the only one which is really relevant in discussing the evidence
for Judith's parentage. Before outlining Decker-Hauff's arguments, it will be
useful to state the three main theories regarding Judith's parentage:
The Baldwin IV Theory: Judith was a daughter of count Baldwin IV of
Flanders by his second wife, a daughter of Richard II of Normandy. This would
make her a half-sister to Baldwin V, and an aunt of Matilda of Flanders, wife
of William the Conqueror. This is the theory that was proposed by Freeman, and
has generally been the most widely accepted one. [Note: It is not reasonable
to make Judith a daughter of Baldwin IV by his first wife Otgiva of Luxemburg,
because that would make Judith a first cousin once removed of her second
husband Welf of Bavaria, who was a grandson of Imiza, Otgiva's sister.]
The Baldwin V Theory: Judith was a daughter of count Baldwin V of Flanders
by his wife Adele/Adelaide, daughter of Robert II of France. This would make
her a full sister of Matilda of Flanders.
The Richard III Theory (Decker-Hauff's Theory): Judith was a daughter of
duke Richard III of Normandy by Adele/Adelaide, daughter of Robert II of
France. This would make her a half-sister of Matilda of Flanders through her
mother. This theory has been accepted in some (mainly German) sources
(including ES, which has given it wider circulation).
For a previous discussion of the question of Judith's parentage, along with
some bibliographic references and some quotes from the primary sources, see my
two part posting from 23 February of this year which had the following subject
lines (x=1,2): "Judith (of Flanders?) m. (1) Tostig (2) Welf (part x of 2)"
Decker-Hauff's arguments
Despite the title of the article, most of the article is devoted to the
case of Judith's parentage. Decker-Hauff starts off by stating the Baldwin IV
and Baldwin V Theories and citing some of the previous literature. For
convenient reference, I will number some of Decker-Hauff's main points,
followed by my own comments.
1. He points out that the Baldwin V Theory has the problem that it would
make Welf and Judith second cousins (both great-grandchildren of Frederick of
Luxemburg).
Comment: A clear strike against the Baldwin V Theory (although not a
conclusive one), which I do not recall seeing mentioned before. The problem
does not affect either the Baldwin IV Theory or the Richard III Theory,
neither of which give Judith the Luxemburg descent.
2. He points out that the Flemish genealogical sources (Flandria Generosa,
etc.) do not mention Judith.
Comment: If this point would be a valid argument that Judith was not a
member of the Flemish dynasty, then the fact that eleventh century Norman
sources do not name Judith as a daughter of Richard III would have to be
considered an equally valid argument against the Richard III Theory. (The fact
that Decker-Hauff has not yet mentioned the Richard III Theory at this point
in the article provides him with a convenient excuse for not mentioning this.)
3. (The onomastic argument) After mentioning Judith's description as
"regina Angliae" in some German sources (to which he later returns: see point
number 7 below), Decker-Hauff mentions the onomastic problem of where Judith's
name came from. It is at this point that he first mentions the Richard III
Theory, stating that the possibility that Judith was only a stepdaughter of
Baldwin V had been briefly brought up by Ernst Klebel in 1955 [Ernst Klebel,
Alemannischer Hochadel im Investiturstreit, in Grundfragen der Alemannischen
Geschichte, Vortrage und Forschungen, hgg. v. Insitut f. gesch.
Landesforschung des Bodengebiets in Konstanz, gel. von Theodor Mayer, (Lindau
und Konstanz, 1955), 234ff.], but had then been abandoned by Klebel in favor
of the Baldwin V Theory. Decker-Hauff pointed out that this theory would make
our Judith a graddaughter of Judith of Brittany (wife of Richard II), and
would therefore explain her name as well as the Baldwin IV Theory (which also
makes our Judith a granddaughter of Richard II and his wife Judith).
Comment: This onomastic argument is a plus for either the Baldwin IV Theory
or the Richard III Theory. However, it cannot be regarded as a major minus for
the Baldwin V Theory, because Baldwin V was a descendant of the famous (but
more remote) Judith of France, wife of Baldwin I, which dilutes (but does not
entirely eliminate) the strength of this onomastic point.
4. Decker-Hauff then makes a statement challenging the second marriage of
Baldwin IV to a Norman princess, on which the Baldwin IV Theory depends. The
sentence in question is quoted here in full:
"Es muss allerdings zugegeben werden, dass die zweite Ehe zwischen Graf
Balduin IV. von Flandern und der normannischen Prinzessin, die allein diese
Namensableitung plausibel machen wurde, nicht so unbedingt feststeht, sondern
erst im 19. Jahrhundert in England als Arbeitshypothese in die Forschung
eingefuhrt wurde, wahrend sie neuerdings von Marcel Prevost mit Stillschweigen
ubergangen wird." [My rough translation: It must certainly be admitted, that
the second marriage between count Balduin IV of Flanders and the Norman
princess, which alone would make this name derivation plausible, is not so
unconditionally certain, but was first introduced in the nineteenth century in
England as a working hypothesis in the research, while it has recently been
passed over in silence by Marcel Prevost.] (A footnote shows that the
reference to Marcel Prevost refers to Dictionnaire de Biographie Francaise.)
No other argument is given for rejecting this marriage, and from this point
on, the Baldwin IV Theory is evidently regarded by the author as having been
conclusively disproven! The remainder of the article discusses the relative
merits of the Baldwin V and Richard III theories.
Comment: The problem is that the statement of the sentence is completely
false. It is simply not true that the marriage was first introduced as a
"working hypothesis" ("Arbeitshypothese") in the nineteenth century. In fact,
the marriage is given by Guillaume de Jumieges, writing in the eleventh
century only forty or so years after the reported marriage, so even though
there is no independent confirmation of the marriage, it is based on a source
written within living memory. Gullaume's statement was certainly not
overlooked by others. Anselme would be a secondary source well before the
nineteenth century who followed Guillaume de Jumieges on this matter (to give
one example).
Obviously, this is a major blunder by Decker-Hauff (and it makes me wonder
if Decker-Hauff was confusing this marriage with the less well documented
marriage of point 5 when he made this statement). Such a marriage reported in
an early source should not be dismissed without significant discussion. Since
this casual dismissal of the marriage resulted in the Baldwin IV Theory being
removed from consideration without reasonable cause, I will briefly comment on
how each of Decker-Hauff's remaining points affects the Baldwin IV Theory.
5. Decker-Hauff then states as apparently undisputed fact that Adelaide of
France, wife of Baldwin V of Flanders and mother of Matilda of Flanders, had
been previously married to Richard III of Normandy. Only secondary sources are
given for this statement.
Comments: This supposed marriage, which is absolutely crucial to the
Richard III Theory, is in fact poorly documented, and quite possibly false.
The only source for Richard's wife Adela is his marriage contract with her
(1026), which does not give her parentage. From the wording of the document
(she is called "Domina Adela" and "juxta nobilitatis tuae lineam dotata"), it
has been suggested that she was a daughter of the king of France, and
therefore the same person as the later wife of Baldwin V, and that appears to
be the entire case for identifying Richard's wife with the wife of Baldwin V!
[See Freeman's History of the Norman Conquest of England vol. 3, 657-8, which
support's this interpretation.]
I have not investigated the history of the suggestion that Richard III's
wife was the same as the French princess who married Baldwin V, but the
problematic documentation for this crucial marriage (if there was such a
marriage) should have been discussed in detail by Decker-Hauff, since his case
disappears without it. (On the other hand, if the marriage of point 5 is
valid, it does not undermine either the Baldwin IV Theory or the Baldwin V
Theory.)
6. Decker-Hauff points out the chronological problem between the date 1051
for the marriage of Tostig and Judith, and the two (alleged) sons of Tostig
who were old enough to fight at Stamford Bridge in 1066, suggesting that the
marriage took place earlier, say about 1047.
Comment: Decker-Hauff does not cite a source for the two sons, but I assume
that he is referring to the ones appearing in some Norse sources. If these
Norse sources are correct in assigning Tostig these two sons (and I would not
regard that as certain), then there is no guarantee that they were Judith's
(as opposed to sons by an earlier unkown wife).
7. Decker-Hauff then returned to a point which he had mentioned earlier,
that Judith is referred to as "regina Angliae" in some German sources. He
suggests that this is best explained by Judith being an agnatic relative of
William the Conqueror.
Comment: This seems rather absurd to me. Some of the German sources call
Judith a wife of king Harold II of England, thereby clearly confusing Tostig
with his brother Harold. It seems clear that this confusion of Tostig and
Harold is the underlying basis of the false attribution of Judith as "regina
Angliae", and not Decker-Hauff's strange suggestion.
8. Decker-Hauff points out the passage in Annalista Saxo in which Judith is
referred to as "ex cognatione beati Ethmundi regis", and points out that in
the Richard III Theory, such a relationship could be easily explained by the
marriage of Emma of Normandy with Aethelred the Unready, while it is difficult
to find such an explanation in the Baldwin V Theory.
Comment: The explanation also fits the Baldwin IV Theory just as well as it
does the Richard III Theory. Also, Annalista Saxo calls Judith "amita"
("aunt", "father's sister" in classical Latin) of Robert "the Frisian", thus
directly supporting the Baldwin IV Theory if the usual meaning of "amita" is
used. (This point is buried by Decker-Hauff in a footnote with the comment
"'Amita' ist ungenau." "Ungenau" means inexact or vague.)
These are the basic arguments given by Decker-Hauff. By summarily
dismissing the Baldwin IV Theory without reasonable cause, and then
undermining the weaker Baldwin V Theory, Decker-Hauff made the Richard III
Theory look stronger than it was. With the exception of his attempt to set
aside the second marriage of Baldwin IV to a Norman princess (for which no
reasonable argument was offered, and a blatantly false statement was given in
the attempt to undermine), every piece of evidence offered in support of the
Richard III Theory is just as strong in favor of the Baldwin IV Theory
(although some of his arguments did successfully undermine the Baldwin V
Theory).
The evidence against the Richard III Theory is considerable. Not only does
every early source which gives a statement about Judith's origin make her a
daughter of a count of Flanders (although disagreeing which one), the earliest
source (Edward the Confessor's biography) makes her a sister of Baldwin V,
directly supporting the Baldwin IV Theory.
Thus, in my opinion, Decker-Hauff does not give a reasonable case, and the
evidence that we do have clearly favors the argument of Freeman (followed by
many others who agreed with him) that Judith's parents were Baldwin IV of
Flanders and a daughter (name uncertain) of Richard II of Normandy.
It should be mentioned that the questions about the two marriages raised in
points 4 and 5 are both of significant interest in their own right in addition
to being closely tied to the current matter. [Ref: Stewart Baldwin SGM
8/12/2002-000336]
The case for making Judith a daughter of count Baldwin IV of Flanders by his
second (Norman) wife was first set out by Freeman, a conclusion that has
gained wide acceptance. .. Because of the circulation among some sources of a
more recent (but ultimately unsatisfactory) theory that Judith was a daughter
of Richard III of Normandy, the evidence is set out [here] in some detail
[Ref: HenryII judit000 10/11/2002]
Pedigree of Judith Of Flanders
/-----
Engelram Count Of Harlebec
/-----
Odoacre Count Of Harlebec
| \-----
Friderada
/-----
Baldwin I Bras De Fer Count Of Flanders
/-----
Baldwin II The Bald Count Of Flanders
| | /-----
Louis I The Fair Emperor Of The West
| | /-----
Charles II The Bald King Of Franks, Emperor
| | | \-----
Judith Of Bavaria
| \-----
Judith
| | /-----
Eudes Count Of Orleans
| \-----
Ermentrude Of Orleans
| \-----
Engeltrude
/-----
Arnold I The Old Count Of Flanders
| | /-----
Egbert The Great King Of England
| | /-----
Ethelwolf King Of England
| | | \-----
Raedburh
| | /-----
Alfred The Great King Of England
| | | | /-----
Oslac Great Butler Of England
| | | \-----
Osburh
| \-----
Alfthryth Of England
| | /-----
Aethelred Earl Of Mercia
| \-----
Ealhswith
| | /-----
Wigmund
| \-----
Eadburgh Of Mercia
/-----
Baldwin III Count Of Flanders
| | /-----
Bernard King Of Italy
| | /-----
Pepin Count Of Senlis, Peronne, & St. Quentin
| | | \-----
Cunigunde
| | /-----
Herbert I Count Of Vermandois
| | | | /-----
Theoderic Count Of Vermandois
| | | \-----
(Unk Dau) Of Vermandois
| | /-----
Herbert II Count Of Vermandois
| | | | /-----
Guerra I Count Of Morvois
| | | \-----
Beatrice Of Morvois
| | | \-----
Eve Of Roussillon
| \-----
Alix De Vermandois
| | /-----
Guiguin Rupert III Count In Wormgau
| | /-----
Rupert IV The Strong Count Of Tours
| | | \-----
Wialdruth
| | /-----
Robert I King Of France
| | | | /-----
Hugh le Mefiant Count Of Tours
| | | \-----
Aelis Of Tours And Alsace
| | | \-----
Ava
| \-----
Hildebrante/Liegarde/Adela
| \-----
Aelis
/-----
Arnold II The Young Count Of Flanders
| | /-----
Billung Count In Saxony
| | /-----
Hermann Billung Duke Of Saxony
| | | \-----
Fraderuna
| \-----
Matilda Of Saxony
| \-----
Hildegarde Of Westerbourg
/-----
Baldwin IV The Bearded Count Of Flanders
| | /-----
Amadeus Count In Payn De Langres
| | /-----
Anchier Count Of Orcheret, Margrave Of Ivrea
| | /-----
Adalbert The Rich Margrave Of Ivrea
| | /-----
Berengar II King Of Italy
| | | | /-----
Hunroch Count of Ternois
| | | | /-----
Eberhard Margrave Of Friuli
| | | | | | /-----
Begue Count Of Paris
| | | | | \-----
Engeltron Of Paris
| | | | | \-----
Aupals
| | | | /-----
Berengar I King Of Italy
| | | | | | /-----
Charlemagne King Of France
| | | | | | /-----
Louis I The Fair Emperor Of The West
| | | | | | | \-----
Hildegarde Of Swabia, Countess Of Vinzgau
| | | | | \-----
Gisele
| | | | | | /-----
Guelph Count Of Andech And Bavaria
| | | | | \-----
Judith Of Bavaria
| | | | | \-----
Edith (Heilwig) Of Saxony, Abbess Of Chelles
| | | \-----
Gisele Of Friuli
| | | | /-----
Maurin PFALZGRAF
| | | | /-----
Suppo Margrave Of Spoleto
| | | \-----
Bertila Of Spoleto
| | | | /-----
Wilfred Count
| | | \-----
Berta
| \-----
Rosela Of Italy
| | /-----
Boso II Count Of Arles And Tuscany
| | /-----
Boso III The Old Count Of Arles And Tuscany
| | /-----
Herbert Marquis Of Transjurian Burgundy
| | /-----
Theobald Count Of Aries
| | /-----
Boso Count Of Aries
| | | | /-----
Louis I The Fair Emperor Of The West
| | | | /-----
Lothair I King Of Italy, Emperor Of The West
| | | | | \-----
Ermengarde Of Haspengau
| | | | /-----
Lothair II The Saxon King Of Lorraine
| | | | | | /-----
Hugh le Mefiant Count Of Tours
| | | | | \-----
Ermengarde Of Tours
| | | | | \-----
Ava
| | | \-----
Bertha Of Lorraine
| | | \-----
Waldrada
| \-----
Willa Of Aries
| | /-----
Guelph Count Of Andech And Bavaria
| | /-----
Conrad I Of Burgandy, Count Of Auxerra
| | | \-----
Edith (Heilwig) Of Saxony, Abbess Of Chelles
| | /-----
Conrad II Duke Of Transjurand Burgandy
| | | | /-----
Hugh le Mefiant Count Of Tours
| | | \-----
Aelis Of Tours And Alsace
| | | \-----
Ava
| | /-----
Rudolph I King Of Upper Burgundy
| | | \-----
Walrada
| \-----
Willa Of Tuscany
| | /-----
Richard Count Of Amiens
| | /-----
Budwine Count Of Metz
| | /-----
Boso Of Vienne, King Of Provence
| | | | /-----
Boso III The Old Count Of Arles And Tuscany
| | | \-----
Richilda
| \-----
Wille
Judith Of Flanders
| /-----
Ketil
| /-----
Hrolfr (Rollo) Duke Of Normandy
| /-----
William Longspee Duke Of Normandy
| | | /-----
Berenger Count Of Bayeux
| | \-----
Poppa
| | | /-----
Gurivant Count Of Rennes
| | \-----
(Unk Dau)
| | | /-----
Erispoe Duke Of Brittany
| | \-----
(Unk Dau) Heiress Of Brittany
| /-----
Richard I The Fearless Duke Of Normandy
| | \-----
Espriota
| /-----
Richard II The Good Duke Of Normandy
| | | /-----
(Unk) Forquelar Of Cirques
| | \-----
Gunnora
\-----
Judith Of Normandy
| /-----
Riroreth Count Of Nantes
| /-----
Adam I The Great Count Of Nantes And Vannes, Duke Of Brit
| /-----
Paskurtan Count Of Rennes
| | \-----
Oreguen
| /-----
Judhael Count Of Rennes
| | | /-----
Gurivant Count Of Rennes
| | | /-----
Berenger Count Of Rennes
| | | | | /-----
Erispoe Duke Of Brittany
| | | | \-----
(Unk Dau) Heiress Of Brittany
| | \-----
(Unk Dau) Heiress Of Rennes
| /-----
Conan I Duke Of Brittany
| | \-----
Gerberge
\-----
Judith Of Brittany
| /-----
Tertellus Senmarchal Of The Gatinais
| /-----
Ingelger Count Of Anjou
| | \-----
Petronel
| /-----
Fulk Le Roux Count Of Anjou
| | | /-----
Geoffrey Count Of The Gatinais
| | \-----
Adela Of The Gatinais
| | \-----
(Unk)
| /-----
Fulk II The Good Count Of Anjou
| | | /-----
Adalard Seigneur De Loches, Lahaye, Villentrois
| | | /-----
Werner Seigneur De Locher Villandry And La Stai
| | \-----
Roscilla
| | \-----
Forcanda
| /-----
Geoffrey I Grisgonelle Count Of Anjou
| | | /-----
Gausfred Count Of Maine
| | | /-----
Gausfred
| | | | \-----
(Unk Dau) Of Orleans
| | | /-----
Gausfred Count Of Nevers
| | \-----
Gerberga Of Nevers
| | | /-----
Hector Noble Of Arverne
| | \-----
Aba
| | | /-----
Bernard Plantevalus Count Of Autun, Marquis Of Toulouse
| | \-----
Aba Abbess Of Sauxillanges
| | \-----
Ermengard
\-----
Ermengarde Of Anjou
| /-----
Pepin Count Of Senlis, Peronne, & St. Quentin
| /-----
Herbert I Count Of Vermandois
| | \-----
(Unk Dau) Of Vermandois
| /-----
Herbert II Count Of Vermandois
| | | /-----
Guerra I Count Of Morvois
| | \-----
Beatrice Of Morvois
| | \-----
Eve Of Roussillon
| /-----
Robert Count Of Troyes
| | | /-----
Rupert IV The Strong Count Of Tours
| | | /-----
Robert I King Of France
| | | | \-----
Aelis Of Tours And Alsace
| | \-----
Hildebrante/Liegarde/Adela
| | \-----
Aelis
\-----
Adele Of Troyes
| /-----
Thierry II Count In The Chamois
| /-----
Manasses I Count Of Vergy, Duxin, And Chalons
| | \-----
(Unk Dau)
| /-----
Giselbert Duke Of Burgandy
| | | /-----
Boso Of Vienne, King Of Provence
| | \-----
Ermengarde
\-----
Adelaide Of Burgundy
\-----
Ermengarde Of Burgandy
Descendants of Judith Of Flanders
2nd generation
3rd generation
4th generation
5th generation