Individual Page

Person Info

• Name: Burga De STUTEVILLE
• Sex: F


Parents:

• Father:
  
• John De STUTEVILLE Death: Abt 1184 in Long Lawford, Newbold-On-Avon
Mother:

• Agnes Death: After 1200

Family:
Marriage:

• William PANTULF .^m1
  
• William PANTULF Birth: 4

Children:

1. William PANTULF Birth: 1 Death: 1194
2. Roger PANTULF Birth: 2 Death: Abt 1220
3. Philip PANTULF Birth: 3 Death: After 1166
4. Roese PANTULF Death: Abt 6 Apr 1294

Bibliography

Sources for birth and parent Information

parents:

[Ref: Farrer EYC v9p24, Rosie Bevan SGM 7/31/2002-221605]

Sources with Inaccurate birth and parent Information

parents:

dotted line to Robert II De STUTEVILLE (#14746) & Eremburga (#14747) [Ref: Chris Phillips SGM 8/9/1999-B]

Sources with Information about marriage to William PANTULF

names:

[Ref: Chris Phillips SGM 8/9/1999-B],

child:

[Ref: CP XII/1 p648(d), Farrer EYC v9p24, Keats-Rohan DD p1059]

Research Notes:
Clay placed Burga tentatively as daughter of Robert II de Stuteville and Erneburga but as you say, the direct evidence does suggests that she was daughter of John de Stuteville. In a charter of grant by William Pantulf to her of dower, of the hamlet of 'Tunga' in Breedon-on-the-Hill, Leics., the witnesses are led by "Robert de Stuteville, Roger de Stuteville, John de Stuteville, his father and John de Stuteville, his brother..." [EYC i; no. 48]. Robert de Stuteville, clearly as senior member of the Stuteville family heads the list, but the subsequent Stutevilles are all of Long Lawford.
William Pantulf, with Burga and their three sons called William, Roger and Philip, was a benefactor of the abbey of St-Andre-en-Gouffern in 1166. Keats Rohan identifies him as a younger son of Ivo Pantulf, lord of Wem by a second marriage with Alice de Verdun [K-R, DD p.1059]

Clay mentions a narrative account in the Pipewell register, where it is stated that Roger de Stuteville gave to Roger Pantulf, his nephew, his manor of Newbold. Roger Pantulf had succeeded the Stutevilles in Newbold, Cosford, and Long Lawford by 1214. His issue were William d.s.p. and two daughters Burgia and Emma [EYC ix 26].
In 1214 Robert son of Maldred demanded against Roger Pantulf a moiety of 8 carucates in Long Lawford, of 5 carucates in Newbold and 3 carucates in Cosford, as his right which ought to descend to him for his share of the sisters of Roger de Stuteville. The source of this is given as Curia Regis Rolls, vii 283.
In March 1281/2 an extent was made of the Stuteville inheritance after the death of Baldwin Wake, son of Joan de Stuteville. Newbold, Cosford and Long Lawford were stated to be held for one knight's fee by the heirs of Roger Pantulf. This appears to be the extent of land originally held by John de Stuteville who was referred to in a record of gift to Pipewell abbey, as lord of Long Lawford, Newbold and Cosford. [EYC ix, 23]. What happened about Robert fitz Maldred's claim is unclear at this point.
John de Stuteville senior held land also in Abkettleby, Holwell and Harby, Leics. which he held of Geoffrey Ridel, and which was confirmed by the latter around 1160. These appear to have passed via Burga to her children and grandchildren. Clay makes the puzzling statement, "It has been noted above that John de Stuteville held an interest in Abketleby and Holwell, co. Leicester; and Roger Pantulf, the plaintiff in 1199, was one of his grandsons and heirs. The deduction can therefore be made, though as a tentative suggestion that Burga, wife of William Pantulf was sister of John de Stuteville the elder, and that her interest in these places was given to her on her marriage with William Pantulf, reservation being made, perhaps, for the continuation of the interest of her brother John for his life. In that event she can be identified as a daughter of Robert de Stuteville II" [EYC ix, 27].
The problem with this statement is that if Roger Pantulf is a grandson of John de Stuteville, and a nephew of Roger de Stuteville, then surely Roger's mother as Burga must be daughter of John de Stuteville the elder. The crux of the problem is that Clay unwilling to believe that Roger Pantulf named in connection with his father's gift in 1166 can be the same one alive in 1220, but there is no reason to assume that Roger had to be an adult at the time.
The following pedigree of Stuteville of Long Lawford is my interpretation. Caveat emptor.
1. Robert II de Stuteville=Erneburga
2.Robert III de Stuteville d.1183=Hawise
2.John de Stuteville, lord of Long Lawford, Newbold and Cosford d. poss bef 1184=Agnes
3.John Stuteville d.s.p.poss 1184
3.Roger d.s.p.1209-1214
3.Burga d.aft 1184=William Pantulf
4.William Pantulf
5 Isolda (widow in 1217)=Walter de Tateshall
5.Eustachia
4.Roger Pantulf succeeded Roger de Stuteville
5.William Pantulf d.s.p.
5.Burgia
5.Emma
4.Philip
3.Joan=Meldred fitz Dolfin
4.Robert fitz Meldred d.1253
5. Geofrey de Neville
=Gilbert le Halsart d.1196
4.Gilbert Halsart/Hansard
5.Gilbert Hansard [Ref: Rosie Bevan SGM 7/31/2002-221605]



Pedigree of Burga De STUTEVILLE
                            /-----(Unk) De Estouteville
                   /-----Robert De Estouteville
          /-----Robert De Estouteville
         |         \-----Beatrix
 /-----John De STUTEVILLE
|         \-----Erneburga
Burga De STUTEVILLE
|         /-----Waleran Fitz HUGH
 \-----Agnes
          \-----Matilda



Descendants of Burga De STUTEVILLE

2nd generation


3rd generation


4th generation


5th generation